While the MMA world waits for the next move of Conor McGregor, the debate goes on, on who he should face next if he does indeed return to the UFC.
I have already posted an article saying that man should be the new Interim Lightweight Champion Tony Ferguson, but there are many who want him to face Nate Diaz to complete their trilogy.
However I think we need to examine the curious case of Diaz to see if he truly warrants a shot at UFC Lightweight Gold.
Diaz is currently ranked the number 6 Lightweight in the UFC rankings, this despite Diaz not having fought at Lightweight since December 2015 when he beat Michael Johnson and not having fought at all since August 2016 when McGregor beat him in their rematch.
I know there are circumstances but surely to be ranked at a certain weight you need to fight at that weight, Diaz hasn’t done that for nearly two years.
Also to be ranked, isn’t it reasonable that you must be active, Diaz hasn’t fought in over a year, surely inactivity in over a year warrants removal from the rankings.
Diaz of course caused the seismic upset when he became the first man to defeat Conor McGregor in a UFC cage, but his record since he failed in a previous tilt at the UFC Lightweight Title against Benson Henderson is pretty average at best.
Including the Henderson bout he has fought 7 times and lost 4 of them. Diaz has lost to Henderson, Josh Thompson, Rafael Dos Anjos and of course McGregor.
Nate Diaz is one popular fighter, a needle mover even, but given his recent record and maybe more importantly his inactivity not a worthy of a shot at the UFC Lightweight Title at this moment in time.
If McGregor does fight and lose to Ferguson which is more than possible, then without a title on the line then yes make the match with Diaz.
If Diaz returns and beats a top ranked Lightweight and McGregor does face and beat Ferguson then a match between McGregor and Diaz is justified, but right now, not for me.
The artwork is courtesy of the very talented Stuntmannjosh who can be found on Facebook and Instagram
Subscribe
52 Responses
This is getting curiouser and curiouser!
And there’s loads more
http://mmasucka.com/2015/04/17/the-curious-case-of-paige-vanzant/
http://www.5thround.com/77818/the-curious-case-of-clay-guidas-fathead/amp/
https://syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/1854444-ufc-167-results-the-curious-case-of-rory-macdonald.amp.html
The curious case of curious case headlines. Who started them? It wasnt me, it wadnt you, it wasnt them……so who was it? Im very curious
http://mmamicks.com/the-curious-case-of-urijah-faber/
https://www.bloodyelbow.com/platform/amp/2017/6/14/15792556/chechen-policy-of-silence-the-curious-case-of-mma-fighter-murad-amriev
http://www.mmaindia.com/the-curious-case-of-the-diaz-brothers/
https://sports.vice.com/en_uk/article/nzxwjk/the-curious-case-of-kurt-angle39s-nonexistent-mma-career-uk-translation
https://www.mmafighting.com/2016/12/4/13674662/the-curious-case-of-a-weigh-in-controversy-leading-to-a-dropped-main
Did your guy get it from the movie? Neither of you are original
What movie?
Curious case of benjamin button
Who the fuck is Benjamin button? Does he train UFC?
Its hardly a copy cat situation!
Original title
Eh? I don’t get it
You guys have almost exact title as ours last week just different fighter
Sure coincidence was weird saw it thought my guy did another one until looked again and saw mma uk
Coincidence that they both have seen the same film?
Just saying it’s weird both sites has same title
Hiya
I haven’t seen any other article, I have had The Curious Case in my head for a few weeks for an article, obviously from the film, I just didn’t have an article to fit the title, until the Nate Diaz story, if I had seen anything else with a similar title I would have called it something else, and as Peter states, there are numerous articles using the same words